Bias Hunter
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Contact

More Alternatives = Choice Overload

13/10/2014

0 Comments

 
Often when you’re roaming around the hallways of a supermarket, you may come across marketing display of some new product, with tasting included. What follows the tasting is an invitation to buy (with a special price!), choosing from a selection of their products. With some brands, the selection might be 20 flavors, with others just one.

The surprising finding: giving people more alternatives is not necessarily a good idea.

In a study by Iyengar and Lepper, two sets of participants were given the opportunity to taste jams in a gourmet food store. One group of people could sample from six flavors, while the other sampled from 24 (including the six the other group had). The result: people sampling from the smaller set were more likely to buy.
Picture
Classical economics would presuppose that more choice options can never be worse. Suppose you are a person who would choose the blackcurrant jam out of the six alternatives. If you’re given 18 other jams to sample from, sure, you might find one you find to be even better. But you could always still pick the blackcurrant. But as the experiment shows, this isn’t the way it works. Since less people bought jam in the second condition, there must be people who would have made a choice from the first set, but were overwhelmed and chose the status quo of no jam with the larger set.

Emphatically, what I’m not saying is that ever fewer alternatives would be always good. Who would want to eat in a restaurant with only one food? No, the point is that there’s a sweet spot of alternatives: too few and too many are both detrimental. With too few alternatives, many customers will not find a product to their liking – thus reducing sales. With too many alternatives, customers suffer from choice overload and give up altogether. Of, even if they manage to pick something out from the options, they will be less satisfied with their choice (Iyengar & Lepper, 2000).

What that sweet spot is, well, that depends on who is making the decisions and in what context. For example, a single mom with two kids in a grocery store won’t have a lot of extra energy to consider 24 different jams. On the other hand, an executive building a new factory may well have a system to evaluate tens or even hundreds of locations.

Like a writer has to think about his audience, so a marketer must think of the decision makers. Are they likely to have supporting software or assistants aiding in the decision? Will they choose the product after a careful analysis, or on a whim after drinks?

I think in terms of marketing advice the research points to a clear conclusion. Whether you’re in B2C or B2B business, keep your sortiment concise enough. Too many alternatives only lead to choice overload. If your website lists all the 20 different parameters I can change about the consulting project, I’m likely to just get confused and choose the status quo: no business with you. It’s wiser to just make a compelling case for the few main project types you do; we can haggle about the niggardly details later.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    December 2016
    November 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014

    Categories

    All
    Alternatives
    Availability
    Basics
    Books
    Cognitive Reflection Test
    Conferences
    Criteria
    Culture
    Data Presentation
    Decision Analysis
    Decision Architecture
    Defaults
    Emotions
    Framing
    Hindsight Bias
    Improving Decisions
    Intelligence
    Marketing
    Mindware
    Modeling
    Norms
    Nudge
    Organizations
    Outside View
    Phd
    Planning Fallacy
    Post Hoc Fallacy
    Prediction
    Preferences
    Public Policy
    Rationality
    Regression To The Mean
    Sarcasm
    Software
    Status Quo Bias
    TED Talks
    Uncertainty
    Value Of Information
    Wellbeing
    Willpower

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.